Description: This article was presented at the 1975 Spring Cincinnati Joint Meeting of the Conference of Actuaries in Public Practice and Society of Actuaries and addresses the impact of the following changes on future needs for pension coverage, future amounts of pension benefits, and costs of funding.

Description: This paper proposes to discuss the various criteria of actuarial soundness, especially as they apply to the railroad retirement system, and to suggest another measure of the financial condition of the system as of any valuation date. From Transactions of Society of Actuaries 1954, Vol. 6, No. 14.

Description: This is a discussion of the paper, Measure of Actuarial Soundness in a Pension Plan of the Railroad Retirement Type by Abraham M. Niessen. From Transactions of Society of Actuaries 1954, Vol. 6, No. 16.

Description: This session discussion is about what constitutes the proper level of financing of retirement plans, objective of proper financing, different measures of funding status, risk related to inadequate financing, recent U.S. developments. From Record of the Society of Actuaries Vol. 13, No. 4A.

Description: This session discussion is about what constitutes an adequately funded plan? It depends on your viewpoint. The session examines adequate funding from four different perspectives. From Record of the Society of Actuaries Vol. 14, No. 1.

Description: This meeting session presentation and discussion occurred at the 1980 SOA Spring Meeting in Minneapolis. The topic was retirement income security in Canada. Specific discussions included: the role of government plans, efforts to improve portability, indexing of private and government plans, funding requirements and how they have developed, disclosure regulations, mandatory retirement ages and mandatory plans, Saskatchewan legislation, human rights regulations, and recommendations of the Lazar Report. From Record of Society of Actuaries, Vol. 6, No. 2.

Description: This session is about United States: Minimum funding requirements, Internal Revenue Service audit guidelines, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, Financial Accounting Standards Board 87 Canada: Surplus contrivances tax reform, pension reform legislation, Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants Standards. From Record of the Society of Actuaries Vol. 13, No. 2.

Description: This 1981 discussion session focuses on funding policy for pension Plans in the United States and Canada from the plan sponsor's viewpoint. Topics include: 1.Alternative uses of cash, 2. Selection of the actuarial cost method, 3. Selection of actuarial assumptions, 4. External constraints such as regulatory constraints, labor agreements, accounting constraints and government contract reimbursement, 5. Use of projections and immunization theory, and 6. The effect of investment strategy on funding policy.

Description: This 1991 panel discussion: 1. Compares and contrasts standards set by various U.S and Canadian agencies- FASB, CICA, GASB, and IRS- for calculations under the Projected Unit Credit Cost Method, 2. Discusses certain types of retirement and ancillary benefits that are not easily handled under the Projected Unit Credit Cost Method, and 3. Provides insight into the nuances of using the Projected Unit Credit Cost Method for pension expense and funding purposes. From the Record of the Society of Actuaries Vol. 17, No. 3B.

Description: This panel discussion examines the valuation problems, funding methods, valuing ancillary benefits, and fluctuations in experience of small pension plans.