Introduction
Spreadsheets are one of the largest workhorses in actuarial work and business work in general, but few of us have serious, rigorous training in their use and design. We usually pick up knowledge and skills through assignments on an as–needed basis, which can prevent a methodical approach to the technology. Alas, I have not created any such needed methodical approach, but I have found a variety of resources, general theories, and specific practices that you may wish to put into effect in your own work.
Below I assemble material I've written, originally published in CompAct, the newsletter for the Society of Actuaries' Technology Section. I start out with "To Err is Human; To Correct, Divine," where I highlight the general problem of spreadsheet errors and point to some useful resources. The next four sections are from a series titled "The End Users Justify the Means" ostensibly about spreadsheet design based on the end users, but the main themes are both usability as well as error–prevention. Finally, I review some presentations given at the 2009 European Spreadsheet Risks Interest Group Annual Conference, which gives one an idea the type of research and work that is being done in this realm.
I hope the ideas found herein may be useful in one's day–to–day work with spreadsheets. Most of the ideas originate with others, and what may be even more useful is the list of my original resources at the end of this paper. This paper is directed primarily toward those who create or maintain spreadsheets, but their managers can also gain valuable insights from the material presented here.
Over the past 20 years, the authors became interested in expanding the literature about health expectancy in two important ways:
The balance of this paper explores these two new aspects in great detail.
Abstract
The paper will focus on two broad areas:
For the first area, the author will discuss different designs of variable and fixed immediate annuities together with investment products in order to manage the longevity risk. In particular, the author will discuss some theoretical results from the doctoral research work of one of his PhD students on integrated post–retirement financial planning. The research describes asset allocation techniques between investment, annuity and insurance products in order to optimally manage post–retirement income and bequest needs subject to ruin probabilities being kept within a prescribed minimum level.
For the second area, the author will describe techniques on how to manage the longevity risk in the secondary market in insurance for impaired policyholders needing liquidity from their existing life insurance policies. The author will describe how he has adapted into the secondary market in insurance the doctoral research work of his PhD student in developing a provision for adverse deviation (PAD) model for the longevity risk of structured settlements. In particular, the author will discuss how life expectancy and qualitative information from external underwriters can be utilized to quantify the slope risk, underwriter misstatement risk and statistical volatility risk of impaired policyholders in order to develop a PAD for the longevity risk.
What do you want to see in the Actuarial Practice Forum? What do you think about the papers we've published so far?
Letters about featured articles and/or topics you'd like to read about are welcomed. Please e-mail your letters and comments to the editor at kbaker@soa.org.
Have you written a paper and would like to submit it for publication? Thinking about writing a paper on a topic that would be suitable for the APF?
Click here for a pdf version of the APF submission guidelines.
© Society of Actuaries 2010
475 N. Martingale Rd., Ste. 600, Schaumburg, Illinois 60173 ph: 847.706.3500 f: 847.706.3599