Description: The author assess the financial performance of pension privatization in Europe.

Description: Feature article discussing the current social insurance schemes in China.

Description: Read the August 2020 issue of In The Public Interest published by the Social Insurance and Public Finance Section. Newsletters provide practical information for the working actuary, articles on trends that impact sections and news about section activities.

Description: Read the March 2020 issue of In The Public Interest published by the Social Insurance & Public Finance Section. Newsletters provide practical information for the working actuary, articles on trends that impact sections and news about section activities.

Description: Essay reforming uninsured health care.

Description: Response to Life Insurance 2020 Foresight – A Call for Essays. An essay stating the author’s vision for the future of the life insurance sector. Focus is on the long term guarantee embedded in the basic life insurance contract to pay the death benefit.

Description: This report focuses on disparities in retirement savings based on race and ethnicity. It includes a thorough review of the literature on the extent of racial disparities in retirement savings and possible causes for and correlates of these disparities.

Description: Session 10C: Redesigning the U.S. Health Care System - You Vote

Description: For this session, we will explore difference in Medicare products from Traditional Medicare to Medicare Advantage. It will clarify different parts of the benefits and the role of Medigap plans. We will then discuss the impending changes in Medicare Part D due to the Inflation Reduction Act, highlighting redesigned benefits, stakeholder impacts, & potential risks. This informative session aims to demystify Medicare, providing insights into existing structures and forthcoming alterations.

Description: Traditional Medicare [TM] has many coverage gaps and no out-of-pocket maximum. Most members must purchase a Medicare Supplement Plan and a Part D plan for pharmacy coverage. Over 50% of members have opted for a Medicare Advantage [MA] plan that replaces TM and the need to purchase a Supplement and (in most cases) a Part D plan. All this for less cost to the member, but at a greater overall cost to the federal government even though MA plans provide TM benefits for less than it costs the government. The attendee will learn why this occurs. However, given these facts, the focus of the session will be on the future of Medicare: namely, should the parameters regarding MA bids and payments be limited to what is paid for TM, or can we take the best administrative techniques of MA and TM to provide more robust benefits for all Medicare members at a cost no greater than the government is currently paying? Or is there an even better idea?