Description: Full version of Taxing Times, May 2006, Volume 2, Issue No. 1.

Description: The article discusses two IRS private letter rulings addressing the application of the section 72(s) after death distribution requirements to joint-life GLWBs covering non-spouses. The article explores the legal basis for the IRS conclusion and the potential utility of the distribution method approved by the ruling.

Description: Full version of Taxing Times, May 2005, Volume 1, Issue No. 1.

Description: This is an article about how to place value on an annuity benefit.

Description: In September 2009, the Internal Revenue Service IRS released a private letter ruling PLR 200939018 June 18, 2009 addressing a contract in which the right to receive annuity payments and otherwise access a contract’s cash value is contingent upon the annuitant living to a specified age. The ruling holds that the contract is an annuity contract for purposes of section 72 of the Code. This article reviews the specifics of the ruling.

Description: A discussion of the three private letter rulings addressing the tax treatment of group insurance contingent annuity contracts providing guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits linked to an investment account released by the Internal Revenue Service.

Description: Full version of Taxing Times, September 2005, Volume 1, Issue No. 2.

Description: This article discusses the implications of a principle-based reserve PBR system with respect to federal income taxation of life insurance companies, particularly with respect to tax reserves and their deductibility for tax purposes. The article discusses potential problems with existing tax rules for reserve deduction, what courses of action the IRS could take, and suggestions for design features of a PBR approach that would make it more consistent with current tax rules. Life insurance product tax implications are also discussed.

Description: Tidbits include discussions about: Policy loans in excess of cost basis, treatment of loss adjustment expenses, LAE, for life insurance companies, and separate account investments in group trusts.

Description: The IRS believes that any segregated asset account comprised of a pool of individual securities will run afoul of the investor control doctrine. This article articulates that such a conclusion would be deeply flawed based on the administrative, congressional, and judicial precedents involving the investor control doctrine.