Description: In practice, the actuary may be required to forgo independent mathematical judgment in order to follow regulations which prescribe specific exposure or enforce counts for full and partial credibility. In this paper the authors give specific examples of such regulation from various states, and discuss the positive and negative features of the regulatory approaches. From Actuarial Research Clearing House, 2003 Vol. 3.

Description: This 1978 panel discussed risk classification systems for a variety of products. Topics covered included: 1. regulatory and social policy encroachment on risk classification systems 2. possible changes in underwriting/marketing strategy because of changed regulatory requirements 3. use of the social imperative via regulation or legislation to mandate availability of coverage to high risk classifications 4. implied use of the risk classification system to provide incentives to control socially undesirable behavior 5. potential use of private mass coverage to minimize the impact on risk classification systems for coverages mandated by law or social policy 6. the ultimate in risk classification systems: self-insurance