Description: This session discussion is about the minimum funding requirements and maximum deductible limits currently in effect, including full funding limitations and funding standard account determinations. From Record of the Society of Actuaries Vol. 15, No. 3B.

Description: This session discussion is about what constitutes an adequately funded plan? It depends on your viewpoint. The session examines adequate funding from four different perspectives. From Record of the Society of Actuaries Vol. 14, No. 1.

Description: This sessions from the 1995 SOA Vancouver Meeting covers the pension actuary's role in the 'top fifty' process, the PBGC's annual list of those companies with the largest underfunding for guaranteed benefits. It also covers FAS87 and the 10k filing. From the Record of the Society of Actuaries, Vol. 21, No, 3a.

Description: Panelists re-examine proposals and ideas for pension funding practice and objectives. From the Record of the Society of Actuaries, Vol. 30, No. 3.

Description: This 1981 discussion session focuses on funding policy for pension Plans in the United States and Canada from the plan sponsor's viewpoint. Topics include: 1.Alternative uses of cash, 2. Selection of the actuarial cost method, 3. Selection of actuarial assumptions, 4. External constraints such as regulatory constraints, labor agreements, accounting constraints and government contract reimbursement, 5. Use of projections and immunization theory, and 6. The effect of investment strategy on funding policy.

Description: This 1991 panel discussion: 1. Compares and contrasts standards set by various U.S and Canadian agencies- FASB, CICA, GASB, and IRS- for calculations under the Projected Unit Credit Cost Method, 2. Discusses certain types of retirement and ancillary benefits that are not easily handled under the Projected Unit Credit Cost Method, and 3. Provides insight into the nuances of using the Projected Unit Credit Cost Method for pension expense and funding purposes. From the Record of the Society of Actuaries Vol. 17, No. 3B.

Description: This discussion is about problems that encounter when seeking general acceptable criteria for minimum sound funding. From Transaction of Society of Actuaries 1961 - vol. 13 pt 2

Description: From the 1960 Transactions Vol. 12 No. 32, this ‘Discussion of Subjects of Special Interest’ addresses the criteria used to judge adequacy of contributions to support benefits, for Taft-Hartley pension plans with fixed benefits and fixed contributions. The panelists also address Internal Revenue Service tests of adequacy in PS 64.

Description: Presented at June 2002 Spring Meeting. Panelists discuss current understanding of interest rate issues in pension plans, recent regulatory changes, adaptation to these changes and possible direction of additional legislation.

Description: This session is about United States: Minimum funding requirements, Internal Revenue Service audit guidelines, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, Financial Accounting Standards Board 87 Canada: Surplus contrivances tax reform, pension reform legislation, Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants Standards. From Record of the Society of Actuaries Vol. 13, No. 2.