Description: Read the June 2017 issue of Health Watch, published by the Health Section. Practical information for actuaries, articles impact sections, section activities.

Description: Read the October 2018 issue of Health Watch, published by the Health Section. Practical information for actuaries, articles impact sections, section activities.

Description: What you need to know about risk scores to be competitive in the Medicare Advantage market.

Description: Surplus and the ACA

Description: Affordable Care Act and Payment Reform

Description: ACA Impact on Employers

Description: Can Direct-to-Provider Contracting Achieve Value-Based Care for Employer-Sponsored Plans? Direct-to-provider contracting is a strategy in which a self-insured entity negotiates a contract directly with a provider of healthcare services rather than through a third-party administrator (TPA), often with the goal of driving value-based care. This article discusses the considerations for employers and providers with direct-to-provider contracting.

Description: This session will explore the national landscape of state Medicaid risk adjustment program design & application and the key differences that drive effective managed care organization program management. Risk adjustment is a mechanism to adjust capitation rates between Managed Care Organizations to account for population morbidity differences. Although many states utilize this mechanism, the application of risk adjustment can vary significantly across states. The primary differences include populations, risk score models and data collection. These state application nuances affect the strategies and tactics utilized by MCOs for effective risk adjustment program management including provider financial alignment, encounter data submission and the capture of accurate diagnosis codes. The session is intended for Medicaid Managed Care Actuaries working to develop or support comprehensive risk adjustment program management functions.

Description: A proposal to reform current health care market, from a 'preferred payer' system, in which Medicare and Medicaid pay less than the true cost while others must then pay more, to a 'value for money' system. This would be achieved by requiring providers to bill all patients the same rate for the same services, with a standard bundling format to make all providers' rate differences transparent. Differences between billed charges and what Medicare pays would be made up by the Medicare patient, rather than subsidized by those outside of Medicare.

Description: A proposal to address provider payment issues by gradually moving to accountable care organizations. Capitations would be risk-adjusted, non-capitated costs would be covered by hospitalization fund and stoploss, incentives for quality & effective preventive care would be tied to the amount remaining in the fund, and government involvement would be through incentives rather than mandate.