Description: This paper examines the argument whether enterprise risk management (ERM) adds value to the entire firm. Using the A.M. Best property/casualty insurance business database from 2000 to 2009 for 794 US insurance companies we found evidence to support this argument.

Description: This paper evaluates the current practice of operational risk management in the insurance sector. Operational risk is nothing new in insurance, but, because of regulatory requirements, companies have initiated computation of risk capital for their operational losses. The current effort to manage operational risk is not a naturally evolving phenomenon, and operational risk, in the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s Basel II definition, is unlikely to be a significant cause of insurers’ failure. In addition, the current Basel II definition of operational risk is not suitable for the insurance sector. Consequently, the invention of models and tools based on the definition is incomplete and illusionary. My findings are based on the analysis of dozens of interviews with insurance industry professionals. I demonstrate the way operational risk is quantified in practice, show that the result obtained from this computation is of littl e use in managerial decision making and propose a set of policy recommendations illustrating the characteristics of operational risk in insurance. This study can be used as a platform for launching dialogues to initiate fresh thinking about operational risk in insurance beyond the current artificial and narrow boundaries.

Description: Abstract: This paper examines the argument whether enterprise risk management (ERM) adds value to the entire firm. Using the A.M. Best property/casualty insurance business database from 2000 to 2009 for 794 US insurance companies we found evidence to support this argument.