Description: This 1991 panel discussion: 1. Compares and contrasts standards set by various U.S and Canadian agencies- FASB, CICA, GASB, and IRS- for calculations under the Projected Unit Credit Cost Method, 2. Discusses certain types of retirement and ancillary benefits that are not easily handled under the Projected Unit Credit Cost Method, and 3. Provides insight into the nuances of using the Projected Unit Credit Cost Method for pension expense and funding purposes. From the Record of the Society of Actuaries Vol. 17, No. 3B.

Description: Defined contribution DC plans are often touted as being far easier for employees to understand than defined benefit DB plans. This may be true during the accumulation phase, but it is not necessarily so at retirement. Many DC plan members have little understanding of converting their DC account balances into income streams at retirement. From the Record of the Society of Actuaries, Volume 29, No. 2, Session 120pd.