Description: This paper examines the funding expectations of the three primary stakeholders in the pension system: plan sponsors, taxpayers, and workers. From The Future of Pension Plan Funding and Disclosure Monograph, M-RS05-1.

Description: Presented at April 1986 Spring Meeting. This session discussion is about the pitfalls of underwriting group pension funding contracts with significant interest guarantees. Insurance companies are faced with concerns in meeting solvency requirements, reducing surplus strain, and managing risk. Methods and procedures that companies are using in evaluating and monitoring risk and in matching assets with emerging liabilities are highlighted.

Description: This 1991 panel discussion: 1. Compares and contrasts standards set by various U.S and Canadian agencies- FASB, CICA, GASB, and IRS- for calculations under the Projected Unit Credit Cost Method, 2. Discusses certain types of retirement and ancillary benefits that are not easily handled under the Projected Unit Credit Cost Method, and 3. Provides insight into the nuances of using the Projected Unit Credit Cost Method for pension expense and funding purposes. From the Record of the Society of Actuaries Vol. 17, No. 3B.

Description: The abstract for the paper Improving Pension Funding: What's in It for me?

Description: A Towers Perrin proposal for pension funding reform.